Evaluation of a Reference Resource

CRAAP test is that the test operated by educators and students to see the credibility and reliability of educational research sources.

We live in a world of data overload. Some information is great, and some of it needs to pass a CRAAP test.

CRAAP is an acronym for Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. Use the CRAAP Test to evaluate your sources.

Evaluation of a Reference Resource

Despite a student’s grade level or school goals, learning literacy skills are vital for promoting critical reflection, informed inquiry, the purpose of knowledge, and personal growth.

Everywhere the method of getting knowledge skills, students must be interested in high-quality sources and resources.

To ensure student access to high-quality resources, teacher-librarians must regularly conduct evaluations of their current devices while attempting out different causes.

Certain criteria should be examined when conducting an evaluation but above all, a “good article source serves to answer a question”.

As proposed by Riedling (2013) in “Reference Skills for the School Librarian”, one must consider the following:

• Content Field Accuracy

• Authority, and Bias

• Design and Presentation

• Relation to Similar Works

• Timelessness and Permanence

• Accessibility and Diversity

To support the evaluation process, a rubric was created based on the criteria described on pages 71-74 in Riedling’s (2013) book “Reference Skills for the School Librarian” and various individual rubrics based on the acronym C.R.A.A.P. which stands for :

• Currency

• Relevancy

• Accuracy

• Authority

• Purpose

Currency -

Because of the comfort of refreshing information digitally, the online version continues current.

The New leaves quickly recognize what articles have been renewed. I reviewed the cost and the World Book is covered in the EBSCO package through our autonomous school association. The annual cost for this complete packet is not much more than the cost of buying only one set of compilations, making this a worthwhile investment.

Relevancy -

The knowledge is convenient to the complete student population. The digital highlights support for more individualized reflection of the “needs of linguistically, culturally, intellectually varied learners and learners with special needs”. I enjoyed the audio article for each thing as this would very help students with more moderate reading ability.

Authority -

This will help the scholar to understand who the author of a specific source Students got to know the author’s affiliation and education level when evaluating a selected source. There should be contact information of the author for confirmation in any source.

Accuracy -

Authority deals with the trustworthiness of the source. Make sure the accuracy of the source connects back to the first content. You should see evidence supporting the knowledge from a specific source for it to be credible. The source must be mentioned and verified from public knowledge.

Purpose -

The desire to inform is clear. No ads or pop-ups were issued nor was any overt promotion or bias apparent. The layout of the leaves is excellent, with ‘clickable’ tabs for further images and video. The use of a white area helps your eye to focus on the important information.

Conclusion

It is generally accepted that the current information aspect places an increasing burden on the information consumer.

The lack of editorial control in a web environment, coupled with personalized search engine results and filter bubbles of disinformation on social media makes obvious the need for keepers to grow our guidance to teach and encourage lateral, fact-checking behaviors and dispositions.